A practical, SEC-compliant guide for foreign nationals moving to the U.S., explaining how foreign assets, pensions, and investments are treated under U.S. tax and reporting rules.
This is a div block with a Webflow interaction that will be triggered when the heading is in the view.
An American I work with in Dublin mentioned, almost in passing, that her joint checking account with her non-US spouse had crossed $10,000 for the first time over the summer. She had never heard of FBAR. She is in good company, most Americans abroad encounter FBAR and Form 8938 for the first time not when they read about them, but when a new adviser asks whether they've been filing. The two forms cause more quiet anxiety than any other part of US cross-border tax, and much of the anxiety is out of proportion to the forms themselves.
This article explains what FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) and Form 8938 are, who must file each, what counts as a reportable account, and how the two regimes overlap without being the same. It is written for US citizens, green card holders, and dual-nationals living abroad, or moving abroad, whose accounts now sit outside the United States. It is educational: it does not address penalty-abatement procedures or the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures, which are separate conversations with a qualified tax adviser.
FBAR, the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, is filed on FinCEN Form 114, separately from the US tax return, through the Treasury's BSA e-filing system. It is administered by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network rather than the IRS, which is one of several quiet indications that FBAR sits in a different corner of the compliance landscape than ordinary tax filing.
A US person, which includes citizens, green card holders, and certain residents, must file FBAR for any year in which the aggregate value of their foreign financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point in the year. "Aggregate" is the word that trips readers up. The threshold is not per account: $6,000 in a Swiss checking account combined with$5,000 in a UK savings account puts the filer over the threshold even though neither account alone crosses it. Signatory authority over a foreign account, even without beneficial ownership, can bring the account into scope.
{{INSET-CTA-1}}
Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, is filed with the federal income tax return and is administered by the IRS under FATCA. It captures a broader asset class than FBAR: not just depository and custodial accounts, but specified foreign financial assets held for investment, including foreign-stock interests held outside a financial account, certain foreign partnership interests, and similar holdings.
The reporting thresholds for Form 8938 are higher than FBAR and vary with filing status and whether the taxpayer lives in or outside the US. Taxpayers who file jointly and live abroad have the highest thresholds; single filers living in the US have the lowest. Because the thresholds are higher, a household below the Form 8938 threshold can still be well above the FBAR threshold, which is why the two forms are not interchangeable.
The cleanest way to see how the two regimes relate is in a single view. The matrix below is not a substitute for checking the current IRS and FinCEN guidance, thresholds and exceptions are updated periodically, but it captures the structural differences most readers care about.
Source: Skybound 2026
The most common FBAR and 8938 errors I see are not malicious omissions. They are honest gaps, accounts or wrappers the filer did not realize were in scope. Three categories produce more of those gaps than any other.
A US citizen who holds a joint account with a non-US-citizen spouse generally has a reportable interest in the full balance for FBAR purposes, not just their share. Couples who assume "her account" does not concern the US filer are frequently surprised. The account remains fully reportable by the US spouse regardless of how the couple thinks about ownership domestically.
Local workplace pensions, UK SIPPs, Swiss Pillar 2 and Pillar 3a, Irish PRSAs, various European employer schemes, can be reportable foreign financial accounts for FBAR, Form 8938, or both, depending on the structure and the degree of vesting. Some plans are in scope from day one; others are in scope only once vested. Many readers assume local retirement accounts are "just pensions" and outside the US regime. They typically are not.
Cash-value life insurance, investment-linked insurance bonds, and similar locally-marketed wrappers are often structured as foreign financial accounts for US reporting purposes. They also frequently contain PFIC-classified investments inside them, meaning the reporting and the underlying tax treatment are both in play. Before taking up a locally recommended investment bond, it is worth asking whether it is a reportable foreign financial account and what it contains.
{{INSET-CTA-2}}
Penalty language in the FBAR statute can read frightening, and in cases of willful concealment, it is. But for the far more common situation of a good-faith filer who did not know about the forms, the regime is more graduated than the headlines suggest. The non-willful FBAR penalty floor is $10,000 per violation; the IRS has discretion within its own procedures for non-filing of Form 8938. The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures exist precisely to provide a path for US taxpayers, living in or outside the US, who failed to report foreign accounts without willful intent.
The general principle across cross-border tax practice is that voluntary, timely correction is treated differently from concealment. A reader who discovers an unfiled FBAR and addresses it proactively with a qualified tax adviser is in a very different procedural position from one whose omission is discovered on audit. Neither is a good position, but the first is nearly always recoverable.
For a US citizen, green card holder, ordual-national with accounts outside the United States, the reportingconversation with a qualified cross-border tax adviser might cover:
Thereporting regime, in my experience, is much more manageable when it isunderstood than when it is avoided. The point of getting it right is not tofear the forms, it is to make everything else in a cross-border financial plancleaner and more durable
Yes. The FBAR threshold is aggregate and is measured as the maximum value at any point in the year. A single day above $10,000 across all foreign accounts combined is enough to trigger the filing requirement, even if the year-end balance is well below the threshold.
No. The two forms are separate and are administered by different agencies. A filer who owes both must file both. Some assets appear on one form and not the other, and the two filings are not reconciled to each other, each stands alone.
The situation is common and is not, in itself, evidence of willful non-compliance. The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures provide a defined path for taxpayers who failed to report non-US accounts without willful intent. Readers in this position should speak with a qualified US tax adviser before filing anything, so that the correction is structured correctly from the start.
In many cases, yes, particularly once vested. Local workplace pensions are frequently in scope for FBAR, Form 8938, or both. The answer depends on the specific plan structure, the country, and the taxpayer's vesting status, and is best confirmed with a cross-border tax adviser on the facts.
Tom Pewtress is Head of USA at SkyboundWealth USA and a member of the Skybound Wealth Management Executive Committee.A fee-based fiduciary adviser with more than a decade advising internationallymobile households, Tom helps US citizens, dual-nationals, green card holders,and families moving to or from the United States align their wealth, taxposition, and long-term plans across borders.
His work focuses on the issues cross-borderclients actually face: 401(k) and IRA decisions when leaving the US, Rothconversion strategy, tax-aware investing across jurisdictions, PFIC andforeign-fund pitfalls, Social Security totalization, and estate planning forfamilies with ties to more than one country.
Tom regularly writes and speaks oncross-border financial planning. He also leads Skybound's global training andproposition work, ensuring the firm's financial planners remain highlytechnically capable in the industry.
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment, tax, or legal advice. Tax and regulatory rules change frequently and their application depends on individual circumstances. Readers should consult qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Skybound Wealth USA is an SEC-registered investment adviser; registration does not imply any level of skill or training.
FBAR and Form 8938 use different definitions of what counts, different thresholds, and different penalty regimes. A clean filing on one is not a clean filing on the other.
A short conversation with Tom can give you a clearer picture of where you standand what is worth acting on first.

Most foreign-account reporting errors are not deliberate. They come from aggregation rules, joint account quirks, and signatory authority that the rules do not telegraph clearly.
Tom Pewtress works with US citizens overseas to map FBAR and Form 8938 obligations against the actual structure of their accounts.

Ordered list
Unordered list
Ordered list
Unordered list
In a private introductory session, Tom canhelp you: